Thursday, July 17, 2008

Darfur News

Prosecutor to Pursue Rebels in Next Case on Darfur Crisis


Published: July 18, 2008

UNITED NATIONS — Days after seeking an arrest warrant for the Sudanese president, the prosecutor at the International Criminal Court said on Thursday that his next case on the conflict in Darfur would focus on the rebels thought to be responsible for a deadly attack on international peacekeepers in September.

Skip to next paragraph
Don Emmert/A.F.P. — Getty Images

Luis Moreno-Ocampo, the prosecutor at the International Criminal Court, on Thursday.

The prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, already has two cases against figures within or aligned with the Sudanese government. His latest, the pursuit of President Omar Hassan al-Bashir on charges of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, has prompted criticism from African countries, as well as China and Russia.

At a closed session of the United Nations Security Council on Wednesday, diplomats said, Russia and China expressed concerns that the prosecutor’s move against Mr. Bashir would hinder efforts to bring peace to the region, potentially opening the door to intervention by the Security Council.

“There were two camps,” one diplomat said of Wednesday’s talks, “those who were implying but not saying that the Council should defer the investigation or the warrants, and those who were saying the independence of the court had to be protected.”

By speaking about his investigation into wrongdoing by rebels, Mr. Moreno-Ocampo may be able to soften the criticism of his action against Mr. Bashir, some analysts said. Richard Dicker, director of the international justice program at Human Rights Watch, said that Mr. Moreno-Ocampo’s remarks were “important in demonstrating the impartiality of his efforts to look at alleged crimes committed by all parties to the conflict.”

“He’s not just going after the government; he’s going after the rebel contingents,” he said.

Mr. Moreno-Ocampo seemed to hint at this himself, telling reporters: “When you go to the Arab world or the African world, as you know, they are tired of double standards. They are tired of justice for my enemies and protection for my friends.”

Mr. Moreno-Ocampo, who spoke at a news conference on Thursday to mark the 10th anniversary of the treaty establishing the international court, said he had the names of two commanders suspected of being responsible for the attack, in which 10 African Union peacekeepers were killed. He urged the rebels to cooperate in the investigation.

He suggested that he would also look into a recent attack in which seven members of the joint United Nations-African Union peacekeeping force were killed.




Elissa Gootman

The New York Times

Copyright 2008

The New York Times Company

July 18, 2008

Sewage

This is too funny to not post...
http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/usa/news/article_1417783.php/San_Francisco_to_vote_on_naming_sewage_plant_after_President_Bush

US News

San Francisco to vote on naming sewage plant after President Bush

Jul 18, 2008, 4:43 GMT

San Francisco - Activists in San Francisco have secured sufficient support to put on the November election ballot an initiative to rename a local sewage plant in 'honour' of President George W Bush.

The Bush critics succeeded in collecting more than 12,000 signatures for renaming the sewerage plant, and an election committee confirmed it, the San Francisco Chronicle said Thursday.

San Francisco voters are to give their approval to change the name of the Oceanside Water Pollution Control Plant to the George W Bush Sewage Plant in November.

A Bush sewerage plant would 'prompt people to ask why,' organizer Brian McConnel, said. 'And they can discuss the Iraq war and everything that led to it.'

'People want to forget bad moments of history, and this is our way of making sure that doesn't happen,' he said.

McConnell and his helpers campaigned with loud, patriotic music and lots of US flags. They said they were determined to keep fighting for votes until November

The United States has statues, libraries, airports and streets named after former presidents. The satirically-named sewage plant memorial for Bush, who leaves office in January, stands good chances of success.

In 2006, 58 per cent of San Francisco voters supported a local initiative to impeach Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney.


Friday, June 13, 2008

Mindless Debacle

Mindless Debacle: Man and Earth.
By Anya




“Farming should be given to machines,” was my boyfriend’s input when we were talking about agriculture and the economy. We were sitting in a sandwich shop a couple of days ago, and one way or the other the topic turned to agriculture and how the fields of agricultural engineering, biology, and biotechnology are all rapidly growing. My boyfriend’s thought was that farming itself should no longer be a human occupation. With the vast technology we have, we should leave it to the machines to farm and allow all the farmers to change their job line.

All I responded was, “I don’t like that idea.” I had no argument, no counterpoint. Nothing. All I could say was, I didn’t like the idea. Perhaps the most frustrating part of my lack of real argument was, I didn’t know why I despised that idea. The subject was subsequently dropped when it was realized I had no input and thoroughly was not happy with my lack of a decent retort. And, I didn’t have the heart to tell him then, but thinking about that made me more angry because in all seriousness, what’s wrong with farms going mechanical? It would save up on a lot of energy, and allow people to put their minds elsewhere.

The number of farmers are steadily decreasing anyway, with most farmers moving to the cities to try their hands in a new craft. A National Geographic article a few years ago stated that many small towns in Kansas and other parts of the Great Plains were diminishing rapidly and the plainest evidence of that was how local elementary schools were closing down. Most of the younger generation left for the cities to try and work their lives there and chose to establish families and households there, instead of the country.

Still, this is no real answer as to what is it about mechanizing farms that disturbs me, but after more thought, the answer comes to me in more of abstract images and pieces that I hope I can connect through this editorial. What seems to be irksome about robotics farming seems to not be that machines are doing the work, but rather that, people aren’t. I come from an old school train of thought, and to me some things are best left small. Instead of Wal-Mart, I like the Mom and Pop stores. Yes, I am a poor broke college student and therefore, I have sold my soul to the corporates, but that doesn’t mean I don’t get to have a preference for one or the other. But what strikes me about farming is, it’s such a basic human industry, that do we really want to hand it over?

Back in the cro-magnon days, humans were nomads. We traveled all across the land chasing after leaping gazelles and so forth. We hunted our food. When we got a bit smarter, we realized that we can stay in one spot and still have our food. How? Farming. We learned how to grow our food, and this development that led us to become sedentary gave us the time and thought to not only fuel ourselves as individuals but helped us leave the tribes and form societies. Societies brought government. Government brought established civilizations. Wait a couple hundred years or so and we have civilizations that are advancing. Picking up on developments such as the concept of zero, the calendar, and city-wide plumbing, we have humans as not only another species of animals roving through planet Earth, but rather a very dominant and intelligent life form that has learned to make the environment adapt to them rather than the other way around (for the most part).

And all this started with agriculture. So if agriculture brought us to great developments, is it alright to just turn around and cut off the human hands that are responsible for tilling the soil, even if those hands operate John Deere tractors?

Perhaps that’s not a real reason to oppose the mechanization of farms.

Well then, how’s this…

True: Farming has been around for centuries. It is the most basic industry established by mankind. False: It is utterly useless in modern society.

Bottom line, we are people. We need food. Agriculture will always be a necessity. But will humans be the necessity?

Perhaps not. Because, as I had no retort a couple nights ago while I was eating my sandwich, I still don’t. I guess there might not be a practical argument I can come up with. What I can say though is there is a certain sense of respect I hold for those that farm, and perhaps because of that I abhor the idea of machines taking over the world of agriculture. Every year I watch my mother plant random vegetables in large pots and every fall, my family can safely munch on these veggies and remark how tasty they are, and my mother with great pride can say she not only cooked them, but grew them. My grandmother used to say the same, on her estate back in the homeland (so to speak). She has a huge tract of land filled with all sorts of tropical fruits and vegetables, most of which remain unknown to the western world and years ago, when my Grandfather was alive, there used to be more fruits and vegetables. He would till the soil, grow all these wonders, and never once did they rely on buying food. Why buy when it’s in your back yard? All year long there was a plethora of food, so much so that food was given to the neighbors, who also had estates of their own and would often return the favor by giving us much of the food we already had. Yet, they were all very proud people.

Now, my grandfather was a highschool headmaster and therefore had a PhD and was definitely a well-educated man, but he spent all his free time in the gardens. Why? Because to him, to every member of my family, there was no greater joy then reaping the benefits of your work, and farming is perhaps one of the most literal ways to live that statement. How could you not enjoy the fruit that grew on the tree you planted? How could those mangoes ever be sour if you planted them? Or what about all the beans that are growing in the patch far over there? They surely, must be delicious. And they were.

Now, my grandmother is not physically able to farm as much as before with my grandfather, and has settled with buying food, but she still talks of how nice it was to not have to buy such items. And my mother has it instilled in her, that there is no greater pleasure than to reap the benefits of one’s hard work. And while, I, her daughter can’t stand to dig in worm-filled dirt, could never pot a plant let alone provide water to a goldfish, I understand if anything, there is a sense of nature in working laboriously to raise food.

From dawn to dusk, to physically till the soil, water the crops, and to grow such commodities and tend to them brings a sense of pleasure. It’s the type of thing that after 15 hours of work when one goes home and crashes into bed, he or she can thing, “yeah, I accomplished something today, and onto more tomorrow” and in a couple of months, harvest time has arrived. Then the reaping of joys begins.

Perhaps that’s it. Farming, no matter how difficult, how painful, how not the suburban me, farming is one physical activity, one human industry , that still brings the man to the earth. Farming makes us realize what a wonder the earth is. The importance of the sun, its rays, its light, its nurture and its force that kindles life on this planet. The need of water, the moisture that softens the earth. the connection that brings the man to the ground.

That’s farming.

And with robots and machines built by the likes of Boeing, controlled by the likes of Haliburton and other construction companies, and harvested and distributed through the hands of Proctor and Gamble, well then farming is corporate.

It’s not man and nature. It’s well crafted crop circles used and harvested and sold for profit only, with the likes of such large companies who would conglomerate within a few years and then, agriculture is owned by one company and one company alone. And suddenly, it costs $50 for an apple.

Then we’re really screwed.

But then again, who am I to voice my opinion?

Darfur

Op-Ed: What needs to be seen

by Kaden



Darfur is a humanitarian crisis. The facts demonstrate that the Sudanese government is responsible for the killing of thousands of innocent civilians. The United States itself has declared the situation to be a genocide. I am not going to go into depth arguing that Darfur is experiencing genocide; if you want a compelling argument for that, visit www.standnow.org

So it is a genocide. Like the Holocaust. Like Rwanda. So why, with all the history of genocides behind us, and with the advanced technology and skills of the 21st century, are we letting this happen?

A government such as ours is only as good as the general will that propels its actions. If the public speaks up on an issue loud enough, the government will take action. If the public remains silent, however, there is no incentive for Congress and the President to pursue a policy. Congress works to please its constituents, afterall, because in the end, the constituents vote members in and out of their seats. Too often, constituents are too embroiled in their own day-to-day issues to be noisy enough about policy. They don't care about issues unless they are on their front door step.

That is what the situation in Darfur boils down to. As morally inclined and compassionate as we'd like to imagine ourselves as Americans and as human beings, we simply don't care enough about the people in Darfur. How many times during the day, during the week do you catch yourself thinking about the citizens of Sudan? Probably not many. And how can you, when you are being bombarded constantly by stories and images of sex scandals and rising gas prices and a worsening economy?

What would solve this? Are we doomed to let bad things happen when they could be easily fixed? It would take the U.S. and other developed countries several helicopters at best to patrol the skies of Darfur. That alone would make a large impact on the attacks that are occurring there. With a weak political will, however, who is going to demand that the U.S. government act?

What we need in order to strengthen our political will is a responsive and informative media. When the situation in Darfur first broke the news, it was a big headline. Remember Brian Steidle, the former Marine who returned from Darfur in 2004 and publicized the atrocities which were occuring there? My guess is that you probably don't. That was three years ago, and scanning the headlines of the newspaper, one hardly ever sees stories or pictures about what is going on there right now. Attacks are still going on at present. But where is the media's attention during all this?

People are sensitive to images and to eye-capturing headlines. We are drawn to excitement, to controversy. What we need now to help the crisis in Darfur is a braver, more informative media. Journalists who are willing to venture to a potentially violent and dangerous area and bring back to the public a vision of what is truly going on. We need an army of Brian Steidles who will unveil the situation with photographs and words and push the issue right in front of the public's eye. We need a story on the front page every day that screams, CIVILIANS ARE STILL DYING IN DARFUR. We need pictures of burning villages, of mass graves, of displaced refugees - this is the ugly reality of Sudan. We need heroes of journalism who will not relent with their reporting until the American people are moved to demand action because they can no longer let the images fade to the back of their mind.

We do like to imagine ourselves so morally inclined and compassionate, afterall.

Friday, May 30, 2008

Art Forum








Artwork by Mary P.

Thursday, May 15, 2008

The Basics

Hello everybody!
Welcome to the SeltzerPost! This is a blog designed to eventually become a source of news and discussion. The news can range anywhere from the latest in international politics to a crocodile found swimming in a local pond. The main posts of this blog will be taken care of by me, but many of the posts will not specifically be by me. This blog is also designed to be a forum for various other things such as art and music. Some local area artists might post some of their work on here and some writers might also like to share their latest works as well. Also, this blog will post some opinions and editorials from aspiring journalists. All in all we hope that this blog will be a sight of news, discussion, and media for any passerby on the world wide web. This is only the beginning and soon enough we will have posts and articles coming in. So once again, welcome and thank you for checking out the SeltzerPost.

Yours truly,
~Anatolia.

Creator and Chief Editor of SeltzerPost